Uri Avnery
27.12.08
“Gush
Shalom” has acceded to my wish to mark my 85th birthday not with a
public celebration, as on my 80th, but with a brain-storming session devoted to
the main issues concerning
The
event took place on the morning of Sunday 21.12.08 in Tel-Aviv’s prestigious Cinematheque hall, under the headline “Until [White] Smoke Comes
Out – Views and Confrontations”. It consisted of two debates: “Two States for
Two Peoples – Realistic or Impossible?” and “The Media: Do They Serve Political
Power and Money or the Public?”
In the
first confrontation, moderated by former Haaretz
editor David Landau, Israela Oron
(of the Geneva Initiative) and Gilad Sher (former advisor of Ehud Barak and senior Israeli representative at the 2000 Camp
David conference) argued that the Two-State solution is viable, while the
historian Meron Benvenisti
argued that it is impossible, and Dr. Menachem Klein
(Bar-Ilan University) took an intermediate position.
In the
second confrontation, senior journalists Ron Ben-Yishai
(who appears in the memorable film “Waltz with Bashir”)
and Rina Matzliach argued
that the Israeli media are free, while Prof. Yaron Ezrachi and senior journalist Ofer
Shelach argued that they are shackled.
At the
close of the event, I was given the floor. This is what I said:
A
Congress of Peace Seekers
DEAR FRIENDS, DEAR PARTNERS,
I have to admit that I am moved. Throughout
my long life I have not been pampered with expressions of affection. I am much
more used to manifestations of hate. Therefore, please excuse me if I am a bit
embarrassed.
PEOPLE ASK ME: How does it feel to be 85?
Well, it is strange. After all, only
yesterday I was 42, the youngest member of the Knesset. I don’t feel any older
or wiser than I did then.
85 is (in the old Hebrew way of numbering
by letters) PH. PH can mean “poh”, here - and yes, I
am here and fully intend to remain here for a while to come – first, because I
enjoy it, and second, because I still have some things to finish.
PH can also mean peh,
mouth – the mouth that enables me to voice my thoughts. I would like to take
this opportunity to share with you some of the thoughts that are occupying my
mind today.
What is special about 85-year-olds in
AND HERE we face a strange paradox. We are
partners in a historic success. And we are partners in a dismal failure.
Perhaps only members of my generation can
fully grasp the extend of our success in the
transformation of the national consciousness.
Many people ask me: where do I draw my
optimism from when the situation becomes very bad, when good people are seized
by depression and despair? At such moments I remind myself - and remind the
people who listen to me – where we started from. I bring this up again and
again for those who did not live through it, and those who have forgotten:
On the morrow of that war, the ‘48 war, when
some of us said that there exists a Palestinian people
and that we must make peace with them, we were a tiny handful here and in the
whole world. We were laughed at. There
are no Palestinians, we were told. “There is no such thing as a Palestinian
people!” Golda Meir was still asserting much later.
Is there anyone today who denies the
existence of the Palestinian people?
We argued that in order to achieve peace, a
Palestinian state must come into being. They laughed at us. What? Why? There is
Today it is a world-wide consensus – two
states for two peoples.
We said that we must talk with the enemy,
and the enemy was then the PLO. Four cabinet ministers demanded that I should
be put on trial for high treason when I met with Yasser
Arafat in
True, the treaties were not implemented and
did not lead to peace. But the mutual recognition between
Today we are saying: we must talk with Hamas. Hamas is an integral part
of the Palestinian reality. And this idea, too, is gaining ground.
What an uproar we caused when we said that
I have devoted 60 years of my life to this
struggle, and it is still in full swing. But we have defeated the idea of a
Greater
Think about this when you feel despair.
Look at the whole picture, not only at the nearest small part of it.
BUT AS BIG as our victory is our
defeat.
It is enough to look at these coming
elections: the three big parties talk almost the same language, and not one of
them puts forward a plan for peace.
There are small parties which say good and honest
things, but at this juncture we simply need more than that. What is lacking is a
major political force that is ready to come to power in order to make peace.
It is quite clear that the results of this coming
election will be bad – and the only question is whether they will be just bad,
or very bad, or even worse.
Why is this happening? There are many
reasons, many pretexts. We criticize – and rightly so - many things, the media,
the education system, all our successive governments, the President of the
But I miss one criticism – the criticism of
ourselves.
My father used to tell me: if the situation
is bad, the first thing to do is to ask yourself if you are alright. So I am
asking: Am I alright? Are we alright?
Yes, we have voiced the right ideas. Our
ideas have won. But what have we done to realize these ideas in practice, on
the political battlefield?
Politics is a matter of power. What have we
done to create a progressive political force in
We in the peace camp include many wonderful
men and women, who confront the army every week in the fight against the Wall,
who monitor the checkpoints, who refuse to serve in
the occupation army, who fight against the occupation in dozens of ways. Many
of us, of all ages, take part in these actions.
But while we stand and protest, the
settlers rush ahead. Another goat and another dunam (
The swamp is political. Only a political force
can drain it. In other words: only a force that can confront the ruling powers,
influence the decisions of the government and the Knesset.
That is a historic failure, and we bear the
responsibility for it.
IF I may be permitted to voice a birthday wish:
the day after the elections I would like us to start thinking about the next
elections.
We have to think anew. From
the ground up. Examine everything we have done up to now and find out where
we went wrong.
Why did we not succeed in convincing enough
of the young, of the Oriental Jewish community, of the immigrants from Russia,
of the Arab community in Israel, of the moderate religious sector – that there
is somebody to talk with, that it is possible to bring about change, that
indeed – we can! Why did we not succeed in touching the heart of the young
generation that is disgusted by politics – by the politics they know?
What is needed is something completely new,
a new act of creation. I would say: we must prepare the ground for an Israeli Obama.
Obama means: to kindle hope where there was no hope before. To demand a
change from the foundations up and believe that it is possible to bring about
this change. To ignite the enthusiasm of masses of young people for a message
that stirs the heart, a message of ending the occupation, of social justice, of
caring for the planet. The longing for a different system –
secular, just, decent, seeking peace.
The new message must address the mind and
the heart, speak to the emotions and not only to the
intellect. It must arouse again the idealism that is hiding in many a heart and
dare not show its face.
The great obstacle to such an explosion is
despair. It is so much easier to despair. So much more
comfortable. It doesn’t demand anything. It is easier to say that
everything is lost. That they have stolen our state.
But pessimism, as is well known, does not give birth to anything, it just leads
to internal or external emigration.
I refuse to be pessimistic. In my 85 years
I have seen too many unexpected, surprising, amazing, things – both good and
bad – for me not to believe in the unexpected. Obama
was unexpected, and here it happened before our very eyes. The fall of the
I WANT to propose the start of a new
endeavor a day after the elections. I would like the best of the
intellectuals and the peace activists, the social activists and the fighters
for the environment to gather and start thinking together, in order to bring
about the Israeli miracle.
Perhaps there should be a grand congress of
those who want change, a Sanhedrin of peace and human rights activists, a kind
of alternative Knesset.
From the heights of my 85 years I want to
call all those to whom our future here is close to the heart, Jews and Arabs,
and especially the young, to mobilize for a joint effort to prepare the ground
for the big change, for the Other Israel, for a state where it will be fun to
live, an Israel we can be proud of.
This is not a game that can be played between
existing organizations, but a completely new political creation, that will
speak a new language, that will bring a new message.
I believe that this will happen, if not
tomorrow then the day after. I wish for myself, and
for all of you present in this hall, that we shall see it with our own eyes,
that we shall be partners, that we shall be able to say: we have succeeded, we
are entrusting the state to good hands.
AND NOW I want to express my heartfelt
thanks to all of you, my friends, who have come to mark my birthday with me by
exchanging views and debating the issues that are so important to all of us.
Heartfelt thanks to the moderators and the
speakers, who have bared the issues for us, to the organizers of this beautiful
event, to the members of Gush Shalom who made it possible. Thanks to all of
you, who have come from near and afar, and thanks for the good wishes you have
showered on me.
I couldn’t imagine a more enjoyable and
exciting birthday. Thank you.